Quadro K6000 2013 12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt 20.83 RTX A2000 2021 6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt 35.61 +71% GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 5700 Arc A580 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results. Quadro K6000 RTX A2000 GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. RTX A2000 has 65% better value for money than Quadro K6000. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Quadro K600020.83 RTX A200035.61 +71% RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results. This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% Quadro K60008052 RTX A200013767 +71% RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 71% in Passmark. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesOpenCLAPI by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Quadro K600022898 RTX A200073133 +219% RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 219% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesVulkanAPI by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Quadro K600025339 RTX A200069535 +174% RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 174% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesCUDAAPI by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% Quadro K600017571 RTX A200084002 +378% RTX A2000 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 378% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K6000 in performance tests. Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro K6000 RTX A2000 Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 3.9105 votes Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.8513 votes Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 245 128 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 11.48 18.98 Architecture Kepler (2012−2018) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU code name GK110B GA106 Market segment Workstation Desktop Release date 23 July 2013 (10 years ago) 10 August 2021 (2 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $5,265 $449 Current price $429 (0.1x MSRP) $567 (1.3x MSRP) Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2880 3328 Core clock speed 797 MHz no data Boost clock speed 902 MHz 1200 MHz Number of transistors 7,080 million 12,000 million Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 8 nm Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 70 Watt Texture fill rate 216.5 124.8 Floating-point performance 5,196 gflops no data Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 267 mm 167 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin None VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB Memory bus width 384 Bit 192 Bit Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 12 GB/s Memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s 288.0 GB/s Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a API compatibility
DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 5.1 6.7 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 3.0 Vulkan + 1.3 CUDA 3.5 8.6 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Gaming performance
Pros & cons summary
Performance score 20.83 35.61 Recency 23 July 2013 10 August 2021 Cost $5265 $449 Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 70 Watt Vote for your favorite
![RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (5)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_logotypes/3/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38 "RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (5)")
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
![RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (29)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile_sad.png "RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (29)")
![RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (30)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile.png "RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (30)")
Questions & comments
![RTX A2000 vs Quadro K6000 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)]()
FAQs
Is Quadro better than RTX? ›
In summary, the choice between a Quadro, RTX graphics card depends on your specific needs and use case. If you are a professional in a field that requires advanced visualization, simulation, or rendering capabilities, then a Quadro card may be the best choice.
How efficient is the RTX A2000? ›The energy efficiency of RTX A2000 is pretty much off the charts—twice (!!) as good as the 6 nanometer RX 6500 XT, twice that of RTX 2060, 80% better than RTX 3050, and 40% better than the RX 6800 non-XT, the most efficient graphics card we ever tested until this review.
What is the most powerful Nvidia Quadro card? ›Overview. NVIDIA® Quadro RTX™ 8000, powered by the NVIDIA Turing™ architecture and the NVIDIA RTX™ platform, combines unparalleled performance and memory capacity to deliver the world's most powerful graphics card solution for professional workflows.
When did the Quadro K6000 come out? ›The Quadro K6000 was an enthusiast-class professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on July 23rd, 2013. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the GK110B graphics processor, in its GK110-890-B1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12.
Why did Nvidia drop Quadro? ›At some point, Nvidia's Quadro and Tesla boards started to overlap and caused even more confusion both externally and internally. Quadro cards are actively cooled and can be used in a desktop to run neural network prototyping even though they are positioned for CAD/CAM and DCC applications.
Has RTX replaced Quadro? ›NVIDIA Quadro is now NVIDIA RTX
If you're looking to update your Quadro product, you'll find that professional visualization products are now branded as NVIDIA RTX™ and all NVIDIA enterprise products are now branded as "NVIDIA".
In 2022 Nvidia released a slightly improved version of the RTX A2000 with more and faster graphics memory. The original 4 GB with 11 Gbits has been doubled to 8 GB GDDR6 clocked at 14 Gbits. The raw performance should be similar to the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti for laptops at the same TGP level.
Is the RTX A2000 worth it? ›It's an excellent choice for CAD users who want to expand into design visualisation, with dedicated tools like KeyShot or GPU ray tracers that are starting to make their way into CAD viewports. But forget about the 6 GB version of the card. 12 GB is a much better fit —now and well into the future.
Is NVIDIA RTX A2000 good for deep learning? ›Purpose-built for deep learning matrix arithmetic at the heart of neural network training and inferencing functions, RTX A2000 series GPUs include enhanced Tensor Cores that accelerate more datatypes and includes a new Fine-Grained Structured Sparsity feature that delivers up to 2X throughput for tensor matrix ...
Why choose Quadro over GeForce? ›For demanding professional workflows that require workstation-class reliability, performance, and software certification over years of usage, Nvidia's Quadro lineup is well worth the premium over GeForce gaming cards.
Why is Quadro more expensive than GeForce? ›
For starters, NVIDIA controls the specifications and quality assurance on all Quadro cards, unlike on GeForce cards, which are left to board partners. So, a Quadro card will only have display port outputs and more of them. They are single slot cards so fit in smaller cases and are hardware validated.
What are Quadro cards best for? ›Quadro is a professional-grade graphics card from NVIDIA, designed for very specific render tasks like computer-aided design (CAD) and professional video rendering, 3D modelling, animation and, increasingly, in the field of machine learning.
What is the newest Quadro GPU? ›Nvidia has since moved away from the Quadro branding for new products, starting with the Turing architecture-based RTX 4000 released on November 13, 2018 and then phasing it out entirely with launch of the Ampere architecture-based RTX A6000 on October 5, 2020.
What is the refresh rate of the Quadro k600? ›Plus, an all-new display engine drives up to four displays with DisplayPort 1.2 support for ultra-high resolutions like 3840x2160 @ 60 Hz with 30-bit color.